Skip to main content
Loading…
This section is included in your selections.

Click here to view prior versions of this section.

A. Overall proposed map amendments reviewed under this chapter shall be approved only if demonstrated by the proponent to be in the public interest, as based on a review of all applicable principals from the following:

1. How the proposal is more consistent than the existing designation with applicable policies of the Vancouver strategic plan and comprehensive plan.

2. How the proposal is more consistent than the existing designation with each of the following objectives as applicable:

a. Encourage more intensive development to locate in major urban centers and corridors, particularly downtown Vancouver. Encourage development of distinct neighborhoods served by commercial nodes, and discourage urban sprawl and strip commercial development;

b. Provide development of uses which are functionally integrated with surrounding areas and neighborhoods in terms of local shopping, employment, recreational or other opportunities;

c. Provide development which is compatible and integrated with surrounding uses in terms of scale, orientation, pedestrian enhancements, and landscaping;

d. Conserve or enhance significant natural or historical features;

e. Provide adequate provision of transportation, water, sewer, and other public services;

f. Provide significant family wage employment opportunities and broadening of the Vancouver economy;

g. Provide for the formation and enhancement of neighborhoods and communities; and

h. Provide affordable or below-market-rate housing opportunities.

3. Scope of review. Review and evaluation of proposed comprehensive plan or zoning map changes shall consider both the likely and possible future use of the site and associated impacts.

4. Cumulative Impacts. The review of individual comprehensive plan map or policy amendments, other than exceptions noted in VMC 20.285.040, shall also consider the cumulative transportation, land supply, and environmental impacts of other plan amendments proposed within the same annual cycle. (Ord. M-3922 § 13, 07/06/2009; Ord. M-3701 § 9, 05/02/2005; Ord. M-3643, 01/26/2004)

Code reviser’s note: ACM M-3701, Amended, 03/17/2008, should be 25 years.